La collection archéologique du site Cartier-Roberval : témoignage unique d’un projet colonial français en Amérique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les interventions archéologiques effectuées sur le site du fort d’en haut de Cartier et de Roberval, sur le promontoire de Cap-Rouge à Québec, ont permis la mise au jour d’une culture matérielle riche et diversifiée. Bien que les travaux de fouille ne soient pas encore complétés, le portrait de la vie des participants à la première tentative de colonisation des rives du Saint-Laurent commence déjà à émerger de l’étude préliminaire de la collection d’artefacts et d’écofacts : on perçoit la persistance de la stratification sociale des origines, la pratique de certains modes de subsistance, la présence d’échanges avec les autochtones ainsi que la réalisation de travaux d’évaluation des richesses naturelles du pays neuf. Un survol des éléments de culture matérielle témoignant de ces différents volets de la vie menée dans le fort Cartier-Roberval sera présenté, pour se poursuivre avec une discussion sur les thèmes de l’exploitation minière, de l’approvisionnement et de la stratification sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".