NMR spectroscopy of a single mammalian embryo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The resolving power, chemical sensitivity and non-invasive nature of NMR has made it an established technique for in vivo studies of large organisms both for research and clinical applications. These features would clearly be beneficial at the nanoliter scale (nL), typical of early development of mammalian embryos, microtissues and organoids, the scale where the building blocks of complex organisms could be observed. However, the handling of such small samples (about 100 micrometers) and sensitivity issues have prevented the widespread adoption of NMR. Recently we have shown how these limitations can be overcome with ultra-compact single-chip probes. In this article we show that such probes have sufficient sensitivity to detect and resolve NMR signals from individual bovine pre-implantation embryos. In less than 1 hour these spherical samples of just 130-190 micrometers produce distinct spectral peaks, largely originating from lipids contained inside them. We further observe how the spectral features, namely the peak intensities, vary from one sample to another despite their optical and morphological similarities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".