MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185089714 · doi:10.5821/ace.16.46.9375

Cidades em tempos de pandemia: um ensaio reflexivo

2021· article· pt· W3185089714 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACE Arquitectura Ciudad y Entorno · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo nasce da inquietude frente ao momento em que o mundo atravessa, no combate a uma pandemia de escala mundial, e busca discutir qual será seu significado para as cidades tais como as conhecemos hoje. Sobre as inovações e as respostas que surgirão no modo de planejar as cidades pós pandemia de Covid-19, há mais perguntas que respostas e para o momento o que é mais válido é a reflexão sobre o assunto a fim de construir questionamentos que fomentem novas pesquisas e abordagens para o tema do planejamento urbano. Para refletir sobre possíveis respostas do urbanismo na atualidade, é feita uma revisão na historiografia do urbanismo, desde seu surgimento, no final do século XIX, discorrendo sobre como foi a resposta do planejamento urbano durante as pandemias e epidemias dos séculos XIX e XX. Este tema é debatido, explicitando-se que o urbanismo surge e se desenvolve buscando criar condições em que o contágio e surgimento de novas epidemias não aconteça, abordando casos de intervenções e planos urbanos na Europa e no Brasil. Por fim, são apontados dados da OMS e da ONU que demonstram que o cenário pandêmico pode se tornar habitual e, os reflexos já observados nas cidades e sociedades, para refletir sobre uma possível resposta do planejamento urbano para o pós-COVID-19 e para o papel dos arquitetos e urbanistas frente a esta crise. É reforçada ideia de que as cidades refletem a sociedade e que esta resposta depende de mudanças que impactam economia e organização social. Aquest article neix de l'malestar que travessa el món en la lluita contra una pandèmia a escala global, i busca discutir quin serà el seu significat per a les ciutats tal com les coneixem avui. Pel que fa a les innovacions i respostes que aniran sorgint en la manera de planificar les ciutats pandèmiques post-Covid-19, hi ha més preguntes que respostes i de moment el més vàlid és la reflexió sobre el tema per tal de construir preguntes que incentivin noves investigacions i aproximacions a el tema de la planificació urbana. Per reflexionar sobre les possibles respostes de l'urbanisme en l'actualitat, es fa un repàs a la historiografia de l'urbanisme, des de la seva aparició a la fi de segle XIX, discutint com va ser la resposta de l'urbanisme durant les pandèmies i epidèmies dels segles XIX i XX. Aquest tema es debat, explicant que l'urbanisme sorgeix i es desenvolupa en un intent de crear condicions en què no passi el contagi i emergència de noves epidèmies, abordant casos d'intervencions i plans urbanístics a Europa i el Brasil. Finalment, s'assenyalen dades de l'OMS i l'ONU que demostren que l'escenari pandèmic pot tornar habitual amb condicions ja observades en ciutats i societats. Cal reflexionar sobre una possible resposta de l'urbanisme per al període post-COVID-19 i la funció dels arquitectes i urbanistes en aquesta crisi. Es reforça la idea que les ciutats reflecteixen la societat i que aquesta resposta depèn de canvis que impacten en l'economia i l'organització social. This article is born out of the concern about the moment that the world is going through, in the fight against a world-wide pandemic, and seeks to discuss what it will mean for cities as we know them today. Regarding the innovations and responses that will arise in the way of planning post-pandemic cities of Covid-19, there are more questions than answers and for the moment what is most valid is the reflection on the subject to build questions that encourage new research and approaches to the theme of urban planning. To reflect on possible responses of urbanism today, a review is made of the historiography of urbanism, since its emergence in the late 19th century, discussing how the response of urban planning was during the pandemics and epidemics of the 19th and 20th centuries. This topic is debated, explaining that urbanism appears and develops seeking to create conditions in which the contagion and emergence of new epidemics does not happen, addressing cases of interventions and urban plans in Europe and Brazil. Finally, data from the WHO and the UN are pointed out that demonstrate that the pandemic scenario may become habitual and, the reflexes already observed in cities and societies, to reflect on a possible response of urban planning for the post Covid-19 and for the role of architects and urban planners in the face of this crisis. It reinforces the idea that cities reflect society, and that this response depends on changes that impact the economy and social organization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it