A decision-level fusion approach to tree species classification from multi-source remotely sensed data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, an object-oriented, decision-level fusion method is proposed for tree species classification based on spectral, textural, and structural features derived from multi-spectral and panchromatic imagery and Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) data. Murphy's average method based on the Dempster Shafer theory (DST) was used to calculate the combined mass function for decision making purposes. For individual feature groups, the mass functions were calculated using the support vector machine (SVM) classification method. The species examined included Norway maple, honey locust, Austrian pine, blue spruce, and white spruce. In addition to these species, a two- or three-species compound class was included in the decision process based on the normalized entropy in the presence of conflict that was itself determined according to whether individual groups of features were consistent. The developed method provided a mechanism to identify tree crowns, which could not be classified to one single species with a high confidence due to the conflict among feature groups. Data used in this study were obtained for the Keele Campus of York University, Toronto, Ontario. Among the 223 test crowns, 204 crowns were assigned to one single species, and the overall classification accuracy was 0.89. A decision could not be made for 19 crowns with confidence, and as a result, a two- or three-species compound class was assigned. The classification accuracy was higher than that obtained using SVM classification based on individual and combined spectral, structural, and textural features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".