<i>Phoma leveillei</i> . [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A description is provided for Phoma leveillei . Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. DISEASE: Generally considered a soil-borne saprobe, but capable of acting act as an opportunistic pathogen. HOSTS: Plurivorous, predominantly plant materials. On and from Acer, Arachis, Bambusa, Beta, Callistephus, Camellia, Campanula, Capsicum, Ceanothus, Chimonanthus, Chrysanthemum, Citrus, Cocos, Coffea, Combretum, Convolvulus, Dianthus, Elaeis , × Fatshedera, Festuca, Fragaria, Grevillea, Hevea, Ipomoea, Juniperus, Lavandula, Malus, Myriophyllum, Pinus, Populus, Pothos, Prunus, Quercus, Rhododendron, Ribes, Scabiosa, Skimmia, Solanum, Spinacia, Tectona, Theobroma, Triticum and Ulmus . Also from filaments of Vaucheria , hay, soil, saline sand, sea and fresh water, alkaline waste water and sludge from rice straw pulp, painted surfaces, photographic film, and fish ( Salmo ). GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: AFRICA: Egypt, Ghana, Malawi, Mauritius, Nigeria, Sudan. NORTH AMERICA: Canada. SOUTH AMERICA: Ecuador. ASIA: Bangladesh, India, Kuwait, Malaysia, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand. AUSTRALASIA: Australia, New Zealand. EUROPE: Great Britain, Netherlands, Spain (Balearic Islands), former Yugoslavia. TRANSMISSION: Soil-borne, but little else is known of other possible vectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".