MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185431956

주요국의 신용생명보험 시장과 국내 발전방안

2021· article· ko· W3185431956 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이경희

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicKorean Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMortgage insuranceBond insuranceBusinessLife insuranceCasualty insuranceGeneral insuranceCredit riskInsurance policyCredit historyIncome protection insuranceActuarial scienceDebtFinancial systemFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the recent COVID-19 crisis, Korea’s household debt exceeds the nominal GDP as of Q3 2020. This paper proposes to make up for the risk of underinsured household debt using credit insurance. Credit life insurance provides cover for debtors’ outstanding loan balance if they are unable to repay their loan due to death, accident & health, and involuntary unemployment. Consumer credit insurance is developed in advanced countries such as the U.S., Canada, and Japan. In the U.S., the National Association of Insurance Commissioners establishes the Credit Insurance Model Act to regulate premium rates and remuneration limits. Rate adequacy is reviewed every three years using the prima facie rates method. Canadian individuals have a 9% mortgage life insurance coverage. In Japan, the market for group credit life insurance related to long-term mortgage loans has developed since 1960s. Korean credit insurance market is underdeveloped due to both low awareness and strict regulation. Potential demand exists considering the household''s debt ratio and the size of debt. Nevertheless, the ownership of death protection insurance including credit life is significantly low level, and as a result, most of them are underinsured. For the development of the market, supervisory regulations framework should be established. It is desirable to use group credit life insurance policy affiliated with public long-term mortgage loans. The insurance companies require the expansion of disruptive channels and target of millennial groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicKorean Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207