20 ans des approches de la communication constitutive des organisations : émergence et innovations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours des dernires annes, plusieurs chercheurs et chercheuses en communication organisationnelle ont mis de l'avant un ensemble d'approches proposant une vision constitutive de la communication (Brummans et al., Putnam et Nicotera, Taylor et Robichaud). Ces approches ont t fdres sous l'appellation communication constitutive des organisations (ou CCO), tiquette qui a t consacre au tournant du sicle (McPhee et Zaug). Mme si l'on peut retracer l'mergence de l'approche constitutive au texte de 1988 de James R. Taylor, Une organisation n'est qu'un tissu de communications, l'anne 2000 fut une anne charnire avec les premires apparitions explicites dans la littrature scientifique de l'appellation CCO et de la notion de constitution, ainsi que la publication de plusieurs textes fondateurs pour le domaine de recherche (ex McPhee et Zaug, Taylor et Van Every).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it