MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185541336 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2021.26545

The Relationship Between Value-Based Care, Workforce Engagement and Clinical Leadership: Learning from an Outpatient Physiotherapy Team

2021· article· en· W3185541336 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michelle Smart, P O'Gorman

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceArgument (complex analysis)Value (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)NursingElement (criminal law)Employee engagementKey (lock)Best practiceMedicinePsychologyMedical educationPublic relationsManagementPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Safety, quality and patient experience are the three key elements of a value-based patient-centred care model. The essential element that brings these together is workforce engagement. This case study illustrates how an outpatient physiotherapy team at a teaching hospital has adapted, evolved and enhanced new practices initiated at the clinician level. Organizations that provide front-line professionals with the tools and frameworks to evolve show value for their people and instill clinical leadership principles with implications for the success of continuous quality improvement initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.373
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicHealthcare Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207