MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3185604921 · doi:10.1101/2021.07.22.453386

Copy number variations with adaptive potential in caribou ( <i>Rangifer tarandus</i> ): genome architecture and new annotated genome assembly

2021· preprint· en· W3185604921 on OpenAlexafffund
Julien Prunier, Alexandra Carrier, Isabelle Gilbert, William Poisson, Vicky Albert, Joëlle Taillon, Vincent Bourret, Steeve D. Côté, Arnaud Droit, Claude Robert

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsUniversité Laval
FundersGénome QuébecMinistère des Forêts, de la Faune et des ParcsGenome Canada
KeywordsBiologyGenomeSequence assemblyCopy-number variationEvolutionary biologyPopulationEcotypeGeneticsGeneComputational biologyTranscriptome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Rangifer tarandus (caribou and reindeer) has experienced recent drastic population size reductions throughout its circumpolar distribution. In efforts aimed at preserving caribou in North America and reindeer in Eurasia, genetic diversity conservation is of utmost importance, particularly the adaptive genetic diversity. To facilitate genomic studies of the caribou population, we improved genome assembly and annotation by combining long-read, linked-read and RNA sequencing technologies. As copy number variations (CNVs) are known to impact phenotype and are therefore likely to play a key role in adaptation, we investigated CNVs among the genomes of individuals representing three ecotypes of caribou (migratory, boreal and mountain). Results Using de novo transcriptome assembly and similarity with annotated human gene sequences, we identified 17,394 robust gene models embedded in a new highly contiguous genome assembly made of 13,994 scaffolds and presenting the highest N50 reported to date. A BUSCO analysis supported the high accuracy of this assembly, 90% of which being represented by only 131 scaffolds. Genome level comparisons with domestic ruminant species showed high synteny within this clade. A total of 1,698 large CNVs (length > 1kb) were identified, including 332 overlapping coding sequences annotated for functions related to immunity, musculoskeletal development or metabolism regulation and others. While the CNV distribution over the genome revealed 31 CNV hotspots, 43 large CNVs were particularly distinctive of the migratory and sedentary ecotypes and included genes annotated for functions related to cardiac development, fatty acid regulation, cold responses, locomotory behavior or environmental perception (hearing and sight), that can be related to the expected adaptations. Conclusions This work includes the first publicly available annotation of the Rangifer tarandu s genome and the first genome assembly allowing genome architecture analyses. This robust annotation based on truly expressed sequences showed a distribution overlapping many CNVs that are promising candidates given the annotations supporting their involvement in adaptation. This new highly contiguous assembly will allow relative localization of genetic variations and features and will be a valuable resource for molecular tool development and genomic studies aimed at describing and preserving this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→