MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3185615364 · doi:10.1242/jeb.236919

Bubble breathing is skin deep for anoles

2021· article· en· W3185615364 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brittney G. Borowiec

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScuba divingUnderwaterChampionFisheryBiologyEcologyGeologyGeographyOceanographyArchaeologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The underwater world is alien to most land animals, a place we only visit briefly before our breath runs out. A few terrestrial animals extend their stay by bringing air with them, such as diving beetles that smuggle bubbles under their wings, or human divers with compressed air tanks. The newest member of the terrestrial SCUBA club are several species of semi-aquatic Anolis lizards, as described by Christopher Boccia, a researcher from the University of Toronto, Canada, and more than a dozen colleagues in their recent study.Spurred on by their own natural history observations of tropical anoles serenely resting at the bottom of streams, the authors rounded up 20 species of anoles (including five considered to be semi-aquatic) at field sites across the Americas and the Caribbean. Using buckets, aquaria or even kiddie pools, they let the anoles dive voluntarily or gently submerged them, paying very close attention to what happened next.When submerged, the anoles took on a silvery sheen, caused by a thin layer of air (a ‘plastron’) forming between the water and their skin. The quicksilver-like coating also invariably connected to a large air bubble around their head to their nostrils. Most species at least occasionally inhaled and exhaled – effectively re-breathing – the bubble while submerged. And when the team compared how many times the different species resorted to re-breathing, the semi-aquatic anoles re-breathed more often and for longer stretches than their non-aquatic cousins. They also stayed underwater longer, with the champion diver of the group staying under for 18 min. Perhaps, the authors mused, the exaggerated re-breathing response in semi-aquatic anoles was an adaptation to their waterfront lifestyle.But that's a hypothesis that only holds if re-breathing serves a physiological function, such as providing oxygen for respiration. To test this idea, the researchers started jabbing an oxygen-measuring probe into the bubbles, looking for evidence that the anoles sucked oxygen out of their bubbles during their dives. They found that the oxygen levels decreased over time in the bubbles and larger anoles consumed oxygen more slowly than smaller ones, which is exactly what they expected from respiring lizards on land. It seems that diving anoles are probably re-breathing the air they take down with them from the surface.There are a few ways that breathing and re-breathing the same bubble of air could help anoles make longer dives. The first is that re-breathing mixed the air inside the anole's body, helping them to extract as much oxygen as possible from the air already in their lungs and throat. The bubble may also help anoles dump carbon dioxide into the water around them, preventing the waste from building up in their bodies. Finally, and most intriguing, the anole might take a page from the book of diving beetles and use bubbles like a physical gill. As the oxygen in the bubble declines, more oxygen is pulled from the water into the bubble, which could allow these air breathers to supplement their breath holding with water breathing!The key to the anole's bubble breathing strategy is probably their waxy skin and the plastron that forms around it, connecting the bubble with their internal respiratory system via the bubble around their nostrils. All anoles get a silvery coating when dunked in water, regardless of their habitat preferences, and so their peculiar skin likely evolved for something other than SCUBA diving, such as keeping clean or dry, and semi-aquatic anoles then co-opted it to create the plumbing of their bespoke underwater breathing apparatus. Anoles may dive deep to keep away from predators or find food, but the trick they use to do it is only skin deep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→