MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185631395 · doi:10.1101/2021.07.28.454016

Automated Reconstruction of Whole-Embryo Cell Lineages by Learning from Sparse Annotations

2021· preprint· en· W3185631395 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Caroline Malin-Mayor, P. B. Hirsch, Léo Guignard, Katie McDole, Yinan Wan, William C. Lemon, Philipp Keller, Stephan Preibisch, Jan Funke

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilYork UniversityHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsTerabyteComputer scienceIdentification (biology)EmbryoArtificial intelligenceLineage (genetic)Process (computing)Cell lineageDeep learning3D reconstructionComputational biologyBiologyPattern recognition (psychology)Cellular differentiationCell biologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a method for automated nucleus identification and tracking in time-lapse microscopy recordings of entire developing embryos. Our method combines deep learning and global optimization to enable complete lineage reconstruction from sparse point annotations, and uses parallelization to process multi-terabyte light-sheet recordings, which we demonstrate on three common model organisms: mouse, zebrafish, Drosophila . On the most difficult dataset (mouse), our method correctly reconstructs 75.8% of cell lineages spanning 1 hour, compared to 31.8% for the previous state of the art, thus enabling biologists to determine where and when cell fate decisions are made in developing embryos, tissues, and organs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207