MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3185733334 · doi:10.4095/328454

Field data and till composition in the GEM-2 Rae Glacial Synthesis Activity field areas, Nunavut and Northwest Territories

2021· report· en· W3185733334 on OpenAlexaffabout
J E Campbell, I McMartin, M W McCurdy, T Tremblay, P X Normandeau, I Randour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlacial periodGeologyGeochronologyPhysical geographyLithologyQuaternaryPleistoceneGeomorphologyArchaeologyPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report releases the field datasets and analytical results from targeted surficial geology studies and till sampling completed in 2017 and 2018 in mainland Nunavut and eastern Northwest Territories as part of Natural Resources Canada's Geomapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM?2) Rae Synthesis of Glacial History and Dynamics Activity in the interior of the Keewatin Sector of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Fieldwork consisted of targeted mapping of glacial flow indicators to resolve the relative ice-flow chronology, sampling material for geochronology to help reconstruct the glacial and post-glacial histories at a regional scale, and documenting the nature and composition of the glacial sediments in various glacial terrains. In addition to the field and analytical datasets, this report provides a detailed description of the field and analytical methods. In 2017, Quaternary geological field observations were made at 92 sites; 39 till and 16 geochronology samples were collected in 5 areas in the Baker Lake and Arviat regions, Nunavut. In 2018, the focus shifted to the Healey Lake area in eastern Northwest Territories and central mainland Kitikmeot region, Nunavut. Quaternary geological field observations were made at 72 sites; 44 till and 17 geochronology samples were collected. Till samples were analysed for matrix geochemistry and texture, gold grain counts, indicator mineral picking and probing, and pebble lithology counts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→