MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3185819151 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2021.3076532

Multiphysics Optimization of Thermal Management Designs for Power Electronics Employing Impingement Cooling and Stereolithographic Printing

2021· article· en· W3185819151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMultiphysicsHeat sinkMechanical engineeringElectronicsPower electronicsSilicon carbideTopology optimizationComputer scienceElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringFinite element methodVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meeting the stringent performance requirements for power electronic converters in electric vehicles requires an integrated approach for optimizing the inherently coupled electrical and thermal performances of converter systems. This article presents a multidisciplinary thermal management design methodology that utilizes genetic algorithms (GAs) to generate topologically optimized geometries for liquid-cooled heat sinks. These GA-generated heat sinks are based on impingement cooling principles and leverage the flexibility of stereolithographic manufacturing techniques. The proposed optimization methodology incorporates the interdependence between the thermal and electrical aspects of the system, and it is capable of targeting performance metrics in either or both domains. This optimization process is demonstrated for a 6.6-kW integrated power module design employing bare-die silicon carbide devices on an FR4-based printed circuit board with embedded ceramic elements. Experimentally validated electrothermal multiphysics simulations of the GA-optimized heat sinks targeting various performance metrics show successful optimization of targeted metrics relative to the initial seed design. The results demonstrate the importance of the multidisciplinary design approach and the effectiveness of the GA-based optimization methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it