ENCOLPION FROM THE VLASII MONASTERY IN VOLOKOLAMSK AND ITS ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Анализируя данные археологических раскопок в церкви Петра и Павла в г. Волоколамске в 2017 г., автор выделяет группу находок (стеклянный браслет, цилиндрический замок типа В, серая керамика с орнаментом «косая волна» раннего вида), которые имеют системные аналогии с комплексом находок из сруба 6 Великого посада Москвы конца XIII – первой половины XIV в., изученного во время раскопок на Красной площади в 1988 г. Это позволяет определить время отложения лицевой створки бронзового креста-энколпиона, который принадлежит к группе энколпионов с изображением Распятия на лицевой стороне и Богоматери Агиосоритиссы (заступницы) на оборотной стороне (тип II.4.3 по Г. Ф. Корзухиной – А. А. Песковой). На основании анализа полученных в ходе раскопок материалов высказано предположение о возникновении монастыря в последней четверти XIII – начале XIV в. Analyzing the data of archaeological excavations in the Church of Peter and Paul in Volokolamsk in 2017, the author identifies a group of finds (glass bracelet, cylindrical lock type B, gray ceramics with the ornament “oblique wave” of the early species), which have systemic similarities with the complex of finds from the construction 6 of the Great Moscow suburb of the late 13th – the first half of the 14th century, studied during excavations on Red Square in 1988. This makes it possible to determine the time of deposition of the front half of the bronze cross-encolpion, which belongs to the group of encolpions with the image of the Crucifixion on the front and the Virgin Agiosoritissa (intercessor) on the reverse side (type II.4.3 according to G. F. Korzukhina – A. A. Peskova). Based on the analysis of the materials obtained during the excavations, it was suggested that the monastery appeared in the last quarter of the 13th – beginning of 14th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".