The outcome of chemotherapeutic regimen by high-risk pre-B-cell protocol in ALL children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of chemotherapeutic regimen by high-risk pre-B-cell potocol in ALL children. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted on 55 children who were treated with the Children Oncology Group (COG) protocol from September 2010 to February 2015 to evaluate the chemotherapeutic regimen results. RESULTS: There was a complete recovery rate of 76.4% during the first week after treatment. Three-year overall survival was 85.5% and five-year overall survival was 81%. Relapse rate after first remission was 20% and death after relapse was 50%. Thirty percent of total deaths were at the induction period. All of the deceased cases died due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: Results showed that the survival rate increased. By choosing the COG protocol and by controlling infection in patients without considering the risk group we can improve survival rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".