Analisis Pengaruh Dinamisme Lingkungan dan Faktor Manajerial Terhadap Perencanaan Strategis dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Organisasi Non-Profit dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
External environment changes and managerial factors are important to be considered in the preparation of strategic planning. Strategic planning is very important for the organization, not only for profit organizations but also for nonprofit organizations because a formal strategic planning can guide them to assess how far their goals have been achieved and how to achieve them. This study discusses how the dynamism of the external environment and managerial factors influence strategic planning and its implications for WWF Indonesia's performance using the Balanced Scorecard approach. The research method used is to use a survey of employees at WWF Indonesia and processed with SmartPLS 3.0. The results show that external business environment dynamism and managerial factors can influence strategic planning which ultimately affects the improvement of WWF Indonesia's performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it