Quantitative elucidation of associations between nucleotide identity and physicochemical properties of amino acids and the functional insight
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies on codon property would deepen our understanding of the origin of primitive life and enlighten biotechnical application. Here, we proposed a quantitative measurement of codon-amino acid association and found that seven out of 13 physicochemical properties have stronger associations with the nucleotide identity at the second codon position, indicating that protein structure and function may associate more closely with it than the other two sites. When extending the effect of codon-amino acid association to protein level, it was found that the correlation between the second codon position (measured by the relative frequencies of nucleobase T and A at this codon site) and hydrophobicity (by the form of GRAVY value) became stronger with 96% genomes having R > 0.90 and p < 1e-60. Furthermore, we revealed that informational genes encoding proteins have lower GRAVY values than operational proteins (p < 3e-37) in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. The above results reveal a complete link from codon identity (A2 versus T2) to amino acid property (hydrophilic versus hydrophobic) and then to protein functions (informational versus operational). Hence, our work may help to understand how the nucleotide sequence determines protein function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".