Multi-fault Detection and Isolation for Lithium-Ion Battery Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various faults in the lithium-ion battery system pose a threat to the performance and safety of the battery. However, early faults are difficult to detect, and false alarms occasionally occur due to similar features of the faults. In this article, an online multifault diagnosis strategy based on the fusion of model-based and entropy methods is proposed to detect and isolate multiple types of faults, including current, voltage, and temperature sensor faults, short-circuit faults, and connection faults. An interleaved voltage measurement topology is adopted to distinguish voltage sensor faults from battery short-circuit or connection faults. Based on the established comprehensive battery model, structural analysis is performed to develop diagnostic tests that are sensitive to different faults. Residual generation based on the extended Kalman filter and residual evaluation based on the statistical inference are conducted to detect and isolate sensor faults. Sample entropy is used to further distinguish between the short-circuit faults and connection faults. The effectiveness of the proposed diagnostic method is verified by multiple fault tests with different fault types and sizes. The results also show that the proposed method has good robustness to noise and inconsistencies in the state of charge and temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".