MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186033709 · doi:10.4000/ces.5990

Graham Huggan and Helen Tiffin, Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment

2012· article· en· W3186033709 on OpenAlexaff
Travis V. Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonwealth Essays and Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsECW Press (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcocriticismPostcolonialism (international relations)Field (mathematics)SociologyAestheticsHistoryEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It makes sense that the first critical introduction to postcolonial ecocriticism is a collaborative effort by Graham Huggan and Helen Tiffin. Both authors have established influential profiles as postcolonial theorists whose work is recognized and cited internationally, and both have been at the front of the nascent field of green postcolonialism. Huggan’s “‘Greening’ Postcolonialism: Ecocritical Perspectives,” published in 2004, explicitly engages two distinctive fields and demonstrates how ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.020
Scholarly communication0.0090.012
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0100.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommonwealth Essays and StudiesSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207