MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186040911 · doi:10.1101/2021.07.17.452375

HAMdetector: A Bayesian regression model that integrates information to detect HLA-associated mutations

2021· preprint· en· W3186040911 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel Habermann, Hadi Kharimzadeh, Andreas Walker, Yang Li, Rongge Yang, Zabrina L. Brumme, Jörg Timm, Michael Roggendorf, Daniel Hoffmann

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsAIDS VancouverSimon Fraser University
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsHuman leukocyte antigenMajor histocompatibility complexComputational biologyBiologyCTL*PopulationBayesian probabilityBayes' theoremEpitopeGeneticsCD8Computer scienceImmune systemArtificial intelligenceAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Motivation A key process in anti-viral adaptive immunity is that the Human Leukocyte Antigen system (HLA) presents epitopes as Major Histocompatibility Complex I (MHC I) protein-peptide complexes on cell surfaces and in this way alerts CD8 + cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes (CTLs). This pathway exerts strong selection pressure on viruses, favoring viral mutants that escape recognition by the HLA/CTL system, e.g. by point mutations that decrease binding of viral peptides to MHC I. Naturally, such immune escape mutations often emerge in highly variable viruses, e.g. HIV or HBV, as HLA-associated mutations (HAMs), specific to the host HLA alleles and its MHC I proteins. The reliable identification of HAMs is not only important for understanding viral genomes and their evolution, but it also impacts the development of broadly effective anti-viral treatments and vaccines against variable viruses. By their very nature HAMs are amenable to detection by statistical methods in paired sequence / HLA data. However, HLA alleles are very polymorphic in the human host population which makes the available data relatively sparse and noisy. Under these circumstances, one way to optimize HAM detection is to integrate all relevant information in a coherent model. Bayesian inference offers a principled approach to achieve this. Results We present a new regression model for the detection of HAMs. As we choose a Bayesian approach we can include the novel sparsity-inducing priors, and we obtain easily interpretable quantitative information on HAM candidates. The basic model can be extended to include prior information relevant to HAM detection, which we demonstrate by integrating predictions of epitope affinities to MHC I, predictions of epitope peptide processing, and computation of phylogenetic background. This integrative method improves performance in HAM detection considerably over state-of-the-art methods. Availability The source code of this software is available at https://github.com/HAMdetector/Escape.jl under a permissive MIT license. Contact daniel.habermann@uni-due.de , daniel.hoffmann@uni-due.de

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207