MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186070753 · doi:10.1063/5.0033094

Demonstration of back contacted III-V/Ge triple junction solar cells

2020· article· en· W3186070753 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Mackré‐Delannoy, Gwénaëlle Hamon, Maïté Volatier, Abdelatif Jaouad, Vincent Aimez, Maxime Darnon

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar cellOptoelectronicsConcentratorMaterials scienceTriple junctionPhotovoltaicsGermaniumSolar cell efficiencyGallium arsenideEnergy conversion efficiencyPhotovoltaic systemEngineering physicsOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringSilicon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lattice matched III-V/Ge solar cells are mainstream for Concentrator PhotoVoltaics (CPV). Having both contacts on the back side could increase efficiency thanks to reduced shading and would provide an alternative to wire-bonding, shingling and MIMs as interconnections methods. In this paper, we present the first demonstration of back side contacted lattice matched III-V on Ge solar cell (InGaP/(In)GaAs/Ge). A specific process was developed to fabricate solar cells with a VOC of 2,38 V and a JSC of 9,9 mA/cm2. This result is a proof of concept and further developments should increase cell performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207