MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186134027 · doi:10.4000/ces.5884

Bénédicte Ledent and Daria Tunca, eds., Caryl Phillips, Writing in the Key of Life

2013· article· en· W3186134027 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kerry–Jane Wallart

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonwealth Essays and Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Stock (firearms)Quarter (Canadian coin)LiteratureArtClassicsPhilosophyHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This remarkably useful volume opens on a few texts written for the purpose of a Liège Conference held in 2006 to celebrate 25 years of writing; and if it might seem reckless to dedicate a monograph to the work of an author who not only still writes but is additionally only in his prime (he was born in 1958), such a stock-taking gesture appears as fully welcome in view of the many turns already taken by Phillips over the span of a quarter of a century. Precisely, one of the qualities of the co...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommonwealth Essays and StudiesSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207