MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186134273

A path to Big Data readiness

2021· article· en· W3186134273 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBig Data Technologies and Applications
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataSection (typography)Variety (cybernetics)Data scienceContext (archaeology)Path (computing)Space (punctuation)Computer scienceChecklistWork (physics)Government (linguistics)Knowledge managementEngineeringData miningPsychologyGeographyArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Big Data readiness” begins at the source where data are first created and extends along a path through an organization to the outside world. This paper focuses on practical solutions to common problems experienced when integrating diverse datasets from disparate sources. Following the Introduction, Section 2 situates Big Data in the larger context of open government, open science, science integrity, and Standards, internationally and in Canada. Section 3 analyses the Big Data problem space, while Section 4 proposes a Big Data solution space. Section 5 proposes eight data checklist modules and suggests implementation strategies to effectively meet a variety of organizational needs. Section 6 summarizes conclusions and describes future work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.285
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.111 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it