Absolute copy number fitting from shallow whole genome sequencing data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Low-coverage or shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) approaches can efficiently detect somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) at low cost. This is clinically important for many cancers, in particular cancers with severe chromosomal instability (CIN) that frequently lack actionable point mutations and are characterised by poor disease outcome. Absolute copy number (ACN), measured in DNA copies per cancer cell, is required for meaningful comparisons between copy number states, but is challenging to estimate and in practice often requires manual curation. Using a total of 60 cancer cell lines, 148 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and 142 clinical tissue samples, we evaluate the performance of available tools for obtaining ACN from sWGS. We provide a validated and refined tool called Rascal ( r elative to a bsolute copy number scal ing) that provides improved fitting algorithms and enables interactive visualisation of copy number profiles. These approaches are highly applicable to both pre-clinical and translational research studies on SCNA-driven cancers and provide more robust ACN fits from sWGS data than currently available tools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".