Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behavioral biometrics survey actions rather than the physical traits of the person. Within this categorization, social behavioral biometrics utilizes an individual's communications for biometric analysis. The investigation of the uniqueness of human preferences and their implications to other aspects of an individual, such as personality or gender, is both a psychological and a biometric problem. An emerging approach is the usage of an individual's aesthetic preferences for the purpose of person identification. Recent research into the identification from visual aesthetics has found that these preferences hold significant discriminatory value. However, aesthetic identification has only been conducted through a visual medium via a set of liked images. The contribution of this work is the development of the first audio aesthetic preference system for person identification. The proposed system extracts descriptive intra-song and inter-song features from a set of songs favored by users and utilizes an ensemble of classifiers for prediction. The final decision is optimized by a genetic algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the developed audio aesthetic system achieves 95% user recognition accuracy on both proprietary and public audio datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it