MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A High Conversion Ratio Quasi-Resonant Flying Capacitor DC-DC Converter

2021· article· en· W3186205494 on OpenAlexaff
Basil G. Eleftheriades, Aleksander Prodic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorInductorTopology (electrical circuits)VoltageElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Boost converterRange (aeronautics)Electronic engineeringLow voltageComputer scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new single-stage wide-range DC-DC converter topology that is well suited for emerging high step-down low-power applications is presented. The topology fully utilizes the energy stored in the flying capacitor thus minimizing its size compared to other flying capacitor-based solutions. Depending on the load value, the converter can operate in either continuous or discontinuous inductor current conduction while providing soft switching. These advantages are achieved by having a discontinuous voltage across the flying capacitor. It is charged from zero to the full input voltage. Thus, the switching losses, which are the largest contributors to the overall losses in high step down low current applications, are minimized.The effectiveness of this single-stage converter is verified with an experiment silicon-based prototype, providing up to 6.5 A of current at the output and operating with various conversion ratios. For operations at 48V-5V, 48V-3.3V, 48V-1V and 24V-1V the topology achieves a peak efficiency of 92%, 90%, 84% and 88%, respectively. In the targeted low power range, and to the best of our knowledge, the efficiency of the introduced topology is comparable to the arguably most efficient single-stage GaN based solutions [1], without a penalty paid in the overall volume of the converter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207