Spirit of the living God, fall afresh on me : a study of discernment and spiritual relationship through spiritual direction within the United Church of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research project explores the understanding of and the experience of spiritual direction among members of the United Church of Canada, both clergy and lay. This is a Qualitative Research study in general and a Phenomenological study in particular. The goal of the research is to explore participants' lived experience of spiritual direction. Research was conducted through an initial survey followed by personal interviews. Participants were drawn from across Canada and represented fifteen of the sixteen Regions within the United Church of Canada. Participants represented both urban and rural congregations and included male, female and members of the LGBTQ community. Both clergy and lay members were represented equally. Participants were drawn from a variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds. This research explored each participant's understanding of spiritual direction, their experience of spiritual direction, and the impact that spiritual direction has had on their personal relationship with God, their community of faith, and their interaction with the wider world. Interviews were also conducted with several former Moderators of the United Church of Canada and several members of faculty at United Church Theological Colleges across Canada. Using the process of phenomenology and the themes of this investigation, the study identifies common experiences from the data and suggests opportunities for the church that affirm the benefits of spiritual direction for individuals and for the church as a whole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.032 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".