MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186389269 · doi:10.29173/mocs154

Steel Beam-Column Joint with Discontinuous Vertical Reinforcing Bars

2015· article· en· W3186389269 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ju-Yun Hu, Won‐Kee Hong, Seon‐Chee Park, Jisoon Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueModular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
KeywordsStructural engineeringColumn (typography)Joint (building)Beam (structure)Materials scienceSteel barPrecast concreteComposite numberComposite materialEngineeringConnection (principal bundle)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors proposed steel beam-column connections for precast concrete frames in previous studies. The steel-concrete composite frames provided fast assembly time as steels with economy of concrete structures. However, when enough space is not available at column-beam joints steel sections from beams cannot be connected with column brackets. This paper suggests that some vertical reinforcing bars are disconnected at joints by connecting vertical steel reinforcements to steel plates placed above and below column steels to provide load transferring path. Loads from re-bars are transferred to steel plates, column steels and back to steel plates and re-bars below column steels. Re-bars connected to steel plates by bolts at above and below column steel are discontinued at joint to provide spaces for connections between column brackets and beam steels. Extensive experiments were performed to verify load transfer from re-bars to steel plates above joints and steel plates to re-bars below joint. The flexural load bearing capacity of a column with total of 24 vertical re-bars were compared to columns with discontinuous re-bars at joints. The number of discontinuous re-bars at joint used in column specimen was 0 (0.0%), 4 (16.7%), 12 (50.0%), and 20 (83.3%). The numbers in parenthesis are the percentages of discontinuous rebars to the total number of vertical re-bars of control column. Experiments showed how loads from vertical steel reinforcements that were cut off at joints were transferred to steel plate. The test results also demonstrated that a part of flexural capacities were reduced for specimen with discontinuous vertical re-bars. The reduction of 6.0 %, 13.7% and 54.0% of flexural capacities were observed for columns with 4 (16.7%), 12 (50.0%) and 20 (83.3%) discontinuous vertical rebars, respectively. The test results can be used to design vertical reinforcing bars and column joints that can provide space for column brackets to which steel members of beams are connected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit ProceedingsSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207