Steel Beam-Column Joint with Discontinuous Vertical Reinforcing Bars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors proposed steel beam-column connections for precast concrete frames in previous studies. The steel-concrete composite frames provided fast assembly time as steels with economy of concrete structures. However, when enough space is not available at column-beam joints steel sections from beams cannot be connected with column brackets. This paper suggests that some vertical reinforcing bars are disconnected at joints by connecting vertical steel reinforcements to steel plates placed above and below column steels to provide load transferring path. Loads from re-bars are transferred to steel plates, column steels and back to steel plates and re-bars below column steels. Re-bars connected to steel plates by bolts at above and below column steel are discontinued at joint to provide spaces for connections between column brackets and beam steels. Extensive experiments were performed to verify load transfer from re-bars to steel plates above joints and steel plates to re-bars below joint. The flexural load bearing capacity of a column with total of 24 vertical re-bars were compared to columns with discontinuous re-bars at joints. The number of discontinuous re-bars at joint used in column specimen was 0 (0.0%), 4 (16.7%), 12 (50.0%), and 20 (83.3%). The numbers in parenthesis are the percentages of discontinuous rebars to the total number of vertical re-bars of control column. Experiments showed how loads from vertical steel reinforcements that were cut off at joints were transferred to steel plate. The test results also demonstrated that a part of flexural capacities were reduced for specimen with discontinuous vertical re-bars. The reduction of 6.0 %, 13.7% and 54.0% of flexural capacities were observed for columns with 4 (16.7%), 12 (50.0%) and 20 (83.3%) discontinuous vertical rebars, respectively. The test results can be used to design vertical reinforcing bars and column joints that can provide space for column brackets to which steel members of beams are connected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".