Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les traces des établissements français échoués du Nouveau Monde nous présentent des aspects de la culture française de la période prospère du règne de Henri IV. D’un côté, on trouve la promotion de l’exploration, la métallurgie et le commerce, de l’autre, on a eu recours à des systèmes médiévaux de la défense et de la stratégie militaire face à divers adversaires. L’occupation française de l’île Sainte-Croix a duré seulement un an (1604-1605), mais pendant les deux derniers siècles, les historiens et les archéologues ont tenté de comprendre cet établissement important. Son histoire est richement documentée avec de nombreuses omissions et contradictions. La combinaison de cette documentation avec ses vestiges archéologiques nous permet de répondre à quatre principaux sujets de la recherche : la défense, l’architecture, l’alimentation et la vie matérielle quotidienne, l’économie des colons et leurs relations avec les autochtones. Après 1604, ils ont appliqué les connaissances acquises à partir de leurs expériences à l’île Sainte-Croix pour établir des habitations permanentes à Port-Royal (1605) et à Québec (1608).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".