Improving CyGNSS-Based Land Remote Sensing: Track-Wise Data Calibration Schemes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CyGNSS) data have been used for generating several intermediate products, such as surface reflectivity (Γ), to facilitate a wide variety of land remote sensing applications. The accuracy of Γ relies on precise knowledge of the effective instantaneous radiative power (EIRP) of the transmitted GNSS signals in the direction of the specular reflection point, the precise knowledge of zenith antenna patterns which in turn affects estimates of EIRP, the good knowledge of receive antenna patterns etc. However, obtaining accurate estimates on these parameters completely is still a challenge. To solve this problem, in this paper, an effective method is proposed for calibrating the CyGNSS Γ product in a track-wise manner. Here, two different criteria for selecting data to calibrate and three reference options as targets of the calibrating data are examined. Accordingly, six calibration schemes corresponding to six different combinations are implemented and the resulting Γ products are assessed by (1) visual inspection and (2) evaluation of their associated soil moisture retrieval results. Both visual inspection and retrieval validation demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed schemes, which are respectively demonstrated by the immediate removal/fix of track-wisely noisy data and obvious enhancement of retrieval accuracy with the calibrated Γ. Moreover, the schemes are tested using all the available CyGNSS level 1 version 3.0 data and the good results obtained from such a large volume of data further illustrate their robustness. This work provides an effective and robust way to calibrate the CyGNSS Γ result, which will further improve relevant remote sensing applications in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".