MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186567851 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.696815

Exposure to Tick-Borne Pathogens in Cats and Dogs Infested With Ixodes scapularis in Quebec: An 8-Year Surveillance Study

2021· article· en· W3186567851 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lauriane Duplaix, Victoria Wagner, Salima Gasmi, L. Robbin Lindsay, Antonia Dibernardo, Karine Thivierge, Christopher Fernandez‐Prada, Julie Arsenault

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversité de Montréal
FundersMinistère de la SantéInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecPublic Health AgencyMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociauxPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsAnaplasma phagocytophilumBorrelia burgdorferiIxodes scapularisTickBiologyIxodesVeterinary medicineBabesiosisCATSTick-borne diseaseVirologyIxodidaeImmunologyMedicineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cats that spend time outdoors and dogs are particularly at risk of exposure to ticks and the pathogens they transmit. A retrospective study on data collected through passive tick surveillance was conducted to estimate the risk of exposure to tick-borne pathogens in cats and dogs bitten by blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) in the province of Quebec, Canada, from 2010 to 2017. Blacklegged ticks collected from these host animals were tested by PCR forBorrelia burgdorferisensu stricto,Borrelia miyamotoi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, andBabesia microti. A total of 13,733 blacklegged ticks were collected from 12,547 animals. Most ticks were adult females and partially engorged. In total, 1,774 cats were infested with ticks and 22.6 and 2.7% of these animals were bitten by at least one tick infected withB. burgdorferiandA. phagocytophilum, respectively. For the 10,773 tick infested dogs, 18.4% were exposed toB. burgdorferipositive ticks while 1.9% of infested dogs were exposed to ticks infected withA. phagocytophilum. The risk of exposure of both cats and dogs toB. miyamotoiandB. microtiwas lower since only 1.2 and 0.1% of ticks removed were infected with these pathogens, respectively. Traveling outside of the province of Quebec prior to tick collection was significantly associated with exposure to at least one positive tick forB. burgdorferi, A. phagocytophilumandB. microti. Animals exposed toB. burgdorferiorB. miyamotoipositive tick(s) were at higher risk of being concurrently exposed toA. phagocytophilum;higher risk of exposure toB. microtiwas also observed in animals concurrently exposed toB. burgdorferi. The odds of dogs havingB. burgdorferiantibodies were higher when multiple ticks were collected on an animal. The testing and treatment strategies used on dogs bitten by infected ticks were diverse, and misconceptions among veterinarians regarding the treatment of asymptomatic butB. burgdorferi-seropositive dogs were noted. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that cats and dogs throughout Quebec are exposed to blacklegged ticks infected withB. burgdorferiandA. phagocytophilum, and veterinarians across the province need to be aware of this potential threat to the health of pets and their owners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207