CCIP: predicting CTCF-mediated chromatin loops with transitivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: CTCF-mediated chromatin loops underlie the formation of topological associating domains and serve as the structural basis for transcriptional regulation. However, the formation mechanism of these loops remains unclear, and the genome-wide mapping of these loops is costly and difficult. Motivated by the recent studies on the formation mechanism of CTCF-mediated loops, we studied the possibility of making use of transitivity-related information of interacting CTCF anchors to predict CTCF loops computationally. In this context, transitivity arises when two CTCF anchors interact with the same third anchor by the loop extrusion mechanism and bring themselves close to each other spatially to form an indirect loop. RESULTS: To determine whether transitivity is informative for predicting CTCF loops and to obtain an accurate and low-cost predicting method, we proposed a two-stage random-forest-based machine learning method, CTCF-mediated Chromatin Interaction Prediction (CCIP), to predict CTCF-mediated chromatin loops. Our two-stage learning approach makes it possible for us to train a prediction model by taking advantage of transitivity-related information as well as functional genome data and genomic data. Experimental studies showed that our method predicts CTCF-mediated loops more accurately than other methods and that transitivity, when used as a properly defined attribute, is informative for predicting CTCF loops. Furthermore, we found that transitivity explains the formation of tandem CTCF loops and facilitates enhancer-promoter interactions. Our work contributes to the understanding of the formation mechanism and function of CTCF-mediated chromatin loops. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of CCIP can be accessed at: https://github.com/GaoLabXDU/CCIP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".