MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186648349 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2021.3098328

Robust Beamforming and Outage Performance of Uplink Multiuser Satellite-Aerial-Terrestrial Networks With Mixed RF-FSO Channels

2021· article· en· W3186648349 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyu Liu, Chenwei Gu, Kefeng Guo, Ming Cheng, Min Lin, Wei‐Ping Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersShanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation FoundationGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTelecommunications linkBeamformingComputer scienceFadingRelayRobustness (evolution)Nakagami distributionChannel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringChannel state informationRadio frequencyComputer networkTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsWirelessElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the uplink transmission in a satellite-aerial-terrestrial network (SATN), where an aerial platform acts as an amplify-and-forward relay assisting the communication between multiple users and satellite. The users send messages to the aerial relay via radio frequency (RF) links, which are then forwarded to the satellite through a free-space optical (FSO) link. By assuming that the angle-of-arrival based imperfect channel state information of each user is known at the aerial platform, we propose a beamforming scheme to maximize the minimum average signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio of the users. Due to the mathematical intractability, we design an iterative algorithm to obtain the optimal beamforming vector for the RF link. Furthermore, by considering that the FSO link experiences the Málaga fading with non-zero boresight pointing error and the RF links follow Nakagami-$m$fading, we derive an analytical expression for the outage probability of the considered SATN. Finally, computer simulation is conducted to validate our theoretical analysis. It is shown that the proposed algorithm can improve the system performance and robustness compared to existing works.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207