MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186671858 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5101133

IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop report on biodiversity and climate change

2021· report· en· W3186671858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) · 2021
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Centre for Biological SciencesWageningen University and ResearchDirectorate for Biological SciencesPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroDeutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-LeipzigUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSenckenberg Biodiversität und Klima ForschungszentrumUniversiteit StellenboschUniversität LeipzigUniversity of California, San DiegoChiba UniversityHelmholtz-Zentrum für UmweltforschungMacquarie UniversityFisheries and Oceans CanadaPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversidade de São PauloIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for ScienceHaramaya UniversityInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsIndian Institute of ScienceChinese Research Academy of Environmental SciencesUniversity of Cape TownUniversity of AberdeenInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement
KeywordsBiodiversityClimate changeEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceGeographyPolitical scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report presents the main conclusions of the first-ever IPCC-IPBES co-sponsored workshop which took place in December 2020. The workshop explored diverse facets of the interaction between climate and biodiversity, from current trends to the role and implementation of nature-based solutions and the sustainable development of human society. This report is underpinned by the Scientific Outcome, which includes seven sections, the complete references and the report glossary. You can find the Scientific Outcome here https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4659158

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.056
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0560.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.023
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.444
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.014 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it