MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186685722 · doi:10.1109/tci.2021.3098927

Online Training of Stereo Self-Calibration Using Monocular Depth Estimation

2021· article· en· W3186685722 on OpenAlexaff
Yotam Gil, Shay Elmalem, Harel Haim, Emanuel Marom, Raja Giryes

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersEuropean Research Council
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceMonocularComputer scienceComputer visionBenchmark (surveying)CalibrationContext (archaeology)Stereo camerasFeature (linguistics)Camera resectioningMeasured depthOutlierConsistency (knowledge bases)StereopsisMathematicsEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stereo imaging is the most common passive method for producing reliable depth maps. Calibration is a crucial step for every stereo-based system, and despite all the advancements in the field, most calibrations are still done by the same tedious method using a checkerboard target. Monocular-based depth estimation methods do not require extrinsic calibration but generally achieve inferior depth accuracy. In this paper, we present a novel online self-calibration method, which makes use of both stereo and monocular depth maps to find the transformation required for extrinsic calibration by enforcing consistency between both maps. The proposed method works in a closed-loop and exploits the pre-trained networks' global context, and thus avoids feature matching and outliers issues. In addition to presenting our method using an image-based monocular depth estimation method, which can be implemented in most systems without additional changes, we also show that adding a phase-coded aperture mask leads to even better and faster convergence. We demonstrate our method on road scenes from the KITTI vision benchmark and real-world scenes using our prototype camera. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/YotYot/CalibrationNet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Computational ImagingSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207