MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186688109 · doi:10.14288/1.0395430

Play Place : An agonistic intervention for Vancouver City Hall

2021· article· en· W3186688109 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stefan Reindl

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Therapy and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgonistic behaviourIntervention (counseling)PsychologySocial psychologyMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The City of Vancouver’s new Department of Agonistics has its sights set on Helena Gutteridge Plaza. Combining the theories of Chantal Mouffe on agonistic public space with the writings of Johan Huizinga on the play-element of human culture, the Department of Agonistics provides a new model for diagnosing and treated failed public spaces. By embracing the playground as a model for agonistic social infrastructure, this project aims to return spaces such as Helena Gutteridge Plaza to the public as sites for spontaneity, expression, and togetherness so that the participatory nature of urban life can be realized and counter-hegemonic narratives may emerge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicChild Therapy and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207