Morphological Assessment of Newly Developed Gladiolus Hybrids (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.) for Flowering and Corm Traits under Sub-Tropical Environment of Delhi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experiment entitled morphological assessment of newly developed gladiolus hybrids (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.) was conducted for flowering and corm traits under sub-tropical environment of Delhi with twenty six gladiolus hybrids along with a standard check variety at the Division of Floriculture and Landscaping, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi in randomized block design with three replications during winter season 2020-21. The results of the experiment showed that hybrids such as Smokey Lady x Mayur, High Hopes Open, P-16-1 x Eurovision, Chandni x Snow Princess and Melody Open Seedling have shown earliness in flowering and took 79.66 - 85.00 days range after planting, whereas hybrids such as Pearl Beauty x Lucky Shemrock took 110.00 day followed by Vidushi (Mutant) 109.33 day, Bindiya x Creamy Green 108.66 day, Pink Parasol Open 108.33 day, Swarnima x Viola and Canada x Green Willow each 108.00 day as compared to remaining hybrids and check variety. The maximum plant height 142.00 cm, rachis length 84.00 cm and number of florets per spike 20.66 was recorded in Bindiya x Creamy Green hybrid. The remaining hybrids such as Green Pasture x Regency, Smokey Lady x Oscar, Vidushi(Mutant) and S. Lady x Headywine and Melody Open Seedling have also showed excellent performance in terms of plant height, spike length, rachis length and number of florets per spike respectively. Moreover, hybrids such as Bindiya Creamy Green, Green Pasture x Regency, S. Lady x Oscar, AVE x Mayur, Salmon Queen Open Seedling, High Hopes Open and Vidush (Mutant) have shown more florets (7.00 -7.66) remain open at a time as compared to check variety and other hybrids, most of them also produced three or more than three corms per plant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".