MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186894617 · doi:10.1149/ma2021-01391279mtgabs

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of CO<sub>2</sub> Electrosynthesis to Fuels and Feedstocks

2021· article· en· W3186894617 on OpenAlexaff
Shariful Kibria Nabil, Sean McCoy, Md Golam Kibria

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrosynthesisSyngasElectrolysisElectrochemistryElectrochemical cellRaw materialFossil fuelElectrolytic cellEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePulp and paper industryWaste managementChemistryCatalysisElectrodeOrganic chemistryEngineeringElectrolyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development of electrochemical pathways to convert CO2 into fuels and feedstock is rapidly progressing over the past decade. Here we present a comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of one and two-step electrochemical conversion of CO2 to eight major value-added products; wherein we consider CO2 capture, conversion and product separation in our process model. We measure the carbon intensity (i.e., global warming impact) of one and two-step electrochemical routes with its counterparts – thermochemical CO2 utilization and fossil-fuel based incumbent synthesis routes for those products. Due to inevitable carbonate formation or CO2 crossover in one-step CO2 electrolysis using neutral pH membrane electrode assembly, the two-step electrosynthesis pathways (CO2 to CO in solid oxide electrolysis cell followed by CO electroreduction in alkaline flow cell) would be distinctively compelling through the lens of climate benefits. This analysis further reveals that the carbon intensity of electrosynthesis products is due to significant energy requirement for conversion (75–85% of total energy consumption for gas products) and product separation (30–85% of total energy consumption for liquid products) phases. Electrochemical route is highly sensitive to the electricity emission intensity and is compelling only when coupled with low emission intensity (<0.25 kg CO2e per kWh). As the technology advances, we identify near-term compelling products that would provide climate benefits over incumbent routes, including syngas, ethylene and n-propanol. We further identify technological goals required for electrochemical route to be competitive, notably achieving liquid product concentration >20 wt%. It is our hope that this analysis will guide the CO2 electrosynthesis community to target achieving these technological goals, such that when coupled with low-carbon electricity, electrochemical route would bring climate benefits in near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207