MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186917261 · doi:10.1094/pdis-05-21-0932-pdn

First Report of <i>Podosphaera aphanis</i> Causing Powdery Mildew on Wild Blackberry Species (<i>Rubus</i> Species) in Mexico

2021· article· en· W3186917261 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alma Rosa Solano‐Báez, Santos Gerardo Leyva‐Mir, M. Camacho-Tapía, Alfonso D. Victoria Arellano, Geremias Rodríguez-Bautista, C. S. Sánchez-Rosas, Guillermo Márquez‐Licona

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto Politécnico Nacional
KeywordsPowdery mildewBiologyRubusRosaceaeBotanyOrnamental plant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HomePlant DiseaseVol. 106, No. 6First Report of Podosphaera aphanis Causing Powdery Mildew on Wild Blackberry Species (Rubus Species) in Mexico PreviousNext DISEASE NOTE OPENOpen Access licenseFirst Report of Podosphaera aphanis Causing Powdery Mildew on Wild Blackberry Species (Rubus Species) in MexicoA. R. Solano-Báez, S. G. Leyva-Mir, M. Camacho-Tapia, A. D. Victoria-Arellano, G. Rodríguez-Bautista, C. S. Sánchez-Rosas, and G. Márquez-LiconaA. R. Solano-Báezhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-5455Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Maestría en Fitopatología y Medio Ambiente, 81217, Ahome, Sinaloa, México, S. G. Leyva-Mirhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1831-2806Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Departamento de Parasitología Agrícola, Texcoco, 56230, Estado de México, México, M. Camacho-TapiaUniversidad Autónoma Chapingo, Laboratorio Nacional de Investigación y Servicio Agroalimentario y Forestal, Texcoco, 56230, Estado de México, México, A. D. Victoria-Arellanohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-3357Laboratório de Interação Planta Patógeno, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Departamento de Fitossanidade, Pelotas, 96010-610, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, G. Rodríguez-BautistaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de la Costa Sur, Autlán, 48900, Jalisco, México, C. S. Sánchez-RosasUniversidad Autónoma Chapingo, Departamento de Parasitología Agrícola, Texcoco, 56230, Estado de México, México, and G. Márquez-Licona†Corresponding author: G. Márquez-Licona; E-mail Address: gmarquezl@ipn.mxhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3981-8585Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos, 62731, Yautepec, Morelos, México AffiliationsAuthors and Affiliations A. R. Solano-Báez1 S. G. Leyva-Mir2 M. Camacho-Tapia3 A. D. Victoria-Arellano4 G. Rodríguez-Bautista5 C. S. Sánchez-Rosas2 G. Márquez-Licona6 † 1Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Maestría en Fitopatología y Medio Ambiente, 81217, Ahome, Sinaloa, México 2Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Departamento de Parasitología Agrícola, Texcoco, 56230, Estado de México, México 3Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Laboratorio Nacional de Investigación y Servicio Agroalimentario y Forestal, Texcoco, 56230, Estado de México, México 4Laboratório de Interação Planta Patógeno, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Departamento de Fitossanidade, Pelotas, 96010-610, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil 5Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de la Costa Sur, Autlán, 48900, Jalisco, México 6Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos, 62731, Yautepec, Morelos, México Published Online:13 Apr 2022https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-21-0932-PDNAboutSectionsView articlePDFSupplemental ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailWechat View articleWild blackberry species (Rubus spp. L.; Rosaceae) represents an invaluable source of genes for the generation of new varieties, but they also serve as a primary source of disease inoculum. During April of 2020, symptoms of powdery mildew were observed on four populations of wild blackberry species located in the states of Chiapas (16°59′11″N, 92°59′07″W; 16°47′08″N, 92°31′05″W) and Michoacán (19°37′17″N, 100°08′59″W; 19°29′25″N, 101°32′54″W), Mexico. Signs of the pathogen were white powdery masses mainly on the top of new shoots. Symptoms included yellowing, necrosis, and early defoliation of the plants. Hyphae were thin-walled, hyaline, smooth, and 4.0 to 9.0 mm wide. Appressoria were indistinct to nipple-shaped. Conidiophores (n = 30, 75 to 225 × 10.5 to 13.5 μm) were straight and unbranched with cylindrical foot cells (n = 30, 31.5 to 158 × 8 to 13.5 μm), straight, somewhat widening upwards, followed by one to three shorter cells. Conidia (n = 100; 25.5 to 38.5 × 9.5 to 22.5 μm) were catenulate, ellipsoid-ovoid to doliiform, containing fibrosin bodies (in 3% KOH). Germ tubes (n = 30, 13.5 to 40.5 × 4.5 μm) emerged laterally and were unbranched with slightly swollen tips. Chasmothecia were not found. Morphological characters of the fungus in all samples corresponded to the previous descriptions of Podosphaera aphanis by Braun and Cook (2012) and Stevanović et al. (2021). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Department of Agricultural Parasitology Herbarium at the Chapingo Autonomous University under accessions UACH421, UACH423, UACH425, and UACH426. To confirm the species identification, the internal transcribed spacer of one sample was amplified using the primers ITS5 (White et al. 1990) and P3 (Kusaba and Tsuge 1995) and sequenced. The sequence was deposited in GenBank (accession no. MW988591). A phylogenetic analysis using Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood was performed (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2018) and included other Podosphaera species (Takamatsu et al. 2010). The sequence from the isolate UACH426 clustered with the strain MUMH1871 of P. aphanis, forming a definite clade, and remained as a sister taxon of P. pannosa. Pathogenicity was verified through inoculation by gently dusting conidia from one powdery mildew patch onto leaves of five healthy blackberry plants of each species. The same number of noninoculated plants served as controls. All plants were maintained in a greenhouse at 25 to 30°C with 75% relative humidity. All inoculated plants developed powdery mildew symptoms after 12 days, whereas no symptoms were observed on noninoculated plants. The fungus recovered from the inoculated plants was morphologically identical to that originally observed on diseased blackberry plants, demonstrating the pathogenicity of the fungus. Based on morphological data and phylogenetic analysis, the fungus was identified as P. aphanis. This fungus has been reported to cause powdery mildew on blackberry plants in Serbia (Stevanović et al. 2021). This is the first report of P. aphanis causing powdery mildew on wild blackberry species in Mexico according to Farr and Rossman (2021). The primary source of inoculum of powdery mildew for commercial plantings is wild blackberry plants from noncultivated areas and may warrant control of wild populations.The author(s) declare no conflict of interest.References:Braun, U., and Cook, R. T. A. 2012. Taxonomic Manual of the Erysiphales (Powdery Mildews). CBS Biodiversity Series No. 11. CBS, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Google ScholarFarr, D. F., and Rossman, A. Y. 2021. Fungal Databases, Syst. Mycol. Microbiol. Lab., ARS, USDA. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ Google ScholarHernández-Restrepo, M., et al. 2018. Persoonia 41:71. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.05 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarKusaba, M., and Tsuge, T. 1995. Curr. Genet. 28:491. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310821 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarStevanović, M., et al. 2021. Plant Dis. 105:503. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1171-PDN Link, ISI, Google ScholarTakamatsu, S., et al. 2010. Persoonia 24:38. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158510X494596 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWhite, T. J., et al. 1990. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Google ScholarFunding: This research was financially supported by the Secretary of Research and Graduate of the National Polytechnic Institute (Instituto Politécnico Nacional), project SIP20201117.The author(s) declare no conflict of interest.DetailsFiguresLiterature CitedRelated Vol. 106, No. 6 June 2022SubscribeISSN:0191-2917e-ISSN:1943-7692 Download Metrics Downloaded 562 times Article History Issue Date: 2 Jun 2022Published: 13 Apr 2022First Look: 20 Jul 2021Accepted: 18 Jul 2021 Page: 1749 Information© 2022 The American Phytopathological SocietyFundingNational Polytechnic Institute (Instituto Politécnico Nacional)Grant/Award Number: SIP20201117Keywordsfungifruitsmall fruitspathogen detectionThe author(s) declare no conflict of interest.PDF downloadCited ByPodosphaera xanthii causing powdery mildew on Impatiens balsamina in China16 December 2021 | Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, Vol. 44, No. 3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207