Deep Learning Models for Pneumonia Identification and Classification Based on X-Ray Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diagnosis based on chest X-rays is widely used and approved for the diagnosis of various diseases such as Pneumonia. Manually screening of theses X-ray images technician or radiologist involves expertise and time consuming. Addressing this, we propose an automated approach for the diagnosis of pneumonia by assisting doctors in spotting infected areas in the X-ray images. We propose a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model for efficiently detecting the presence of pneumonia in the X-ray images. The proposed CNN is designed with 5 convolution blocks followed by 4 fully connected layers. In order to boost the performance of the model, we incorporate batch normalization, dynamic dropout, learning rate decay, L2 regularization weight decay along with Adam optimizer and binary Cross-Entropy loss function while training the model using back propagating algorithm. The proposed model is validated on two publicly accessible benchmark datasets, and the experimental studies conducted on these datasets indicate that the proposed model is efficient. The suggested CNN architecture with specified hyper parameters allows the model to outperform several existing models by achieving accuracy of 97.73% and 91.17% respectively for binary and multi-class classification tasks of pneumonia disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".