Extraction and Classification of Image Features for Fire Recognition Based on Convolutional Neural Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fire image monitoring systems are being applied to more and more fields, owing to their large monitoring area. However, the existing image processing-based fire detection technology cannot effectively make real-time fire warning in actual scenes, and the relevant fire recognition algorithms are not robust enough. To solve the problems, this paper tries to extract and classify image features for fire recognition based on convolutional neural network (CNN). Specifically, the authors set up the framework of a fire recognition system based on fire video images (FVIFRS), and extracted both static and dynamic features of flame. To improve the efficiency of image analysis, a Gaussian mixture model was established to extract the features from the fire smoke movement areas. Finally, the CNN was improved to process and classify the fire feature maps of the CNN. The proposed algorithm and model were proved to be feasible and effective through experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it