Degradation of Red Blood Cell Deformability during Cold Storage in Blood Bags
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Red blood cells (RBCs) stored in blood bags develop a storage lesion that include structural, metabolic, and morphologic transformations resulting in a progressive loss of RBC deformability. The speed of RBC deformability loss is donor-dependent, which if properly characterized, could be used as a biomarker to select high-quality RBC units for sensitive recipients or to provide customized storage timelines depending on the donor. We used the microfluidic ratchet device to measure the deformability of red blood cells stored in blood bags every 14 days over a span of 56 days. We observed that storage in blood bags generally prevented RBC deformability loss over the current standard 42-day storage window. However, between 42 and 56 days, the deformability loss profile varied dramatically between donors. In particular, we observed accelerated RBC deformability loss for a majority of male donors, but for none of the female donors. Together, our results suggest that RBC deformability loss could be used to screen for donors who can provide stable RBCs for sensitive transfusion recipients or to identify donors capable of providing RBCs that could be stored for longer than the current 42-day expiration window.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".