MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187148885 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-30473/v1

A blood-based comprehensive and systems-level analysis of disease stages, immune regulation and symptoms in COVID-19 patients

2020· preprint· en· W3187148885 on OpenAlexaff
Anguraj Sadanandam, Tobias Bopp, Santosh Dixit, David J. H. F. Knapp, Chitra Priya Emperumal, Krishnaraj Rajalingam, Alan Melcher, Nagarajan Kannan

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Immune system2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)DiseaseMedicineImmunologyVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract COVID-19 patients show significant clinical heterogeneity in presentation and outcomes that makes pandemic control and strategy difficult; optimising management requires a systems biology approach of understanding the disease. Here we sought to understand and infer complex system-wide changes in patients infected with coronaviruses (SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2; n=38 and 57 samples) at two different disease stages compared with healthy individuals (n=16) and patients with other infections (n=144). We applied inferential statistics/machine-learning approaches (the COVID-engine platform) to RNA profiles derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Compared to healthy individuals, an integrated blood-based gene signatures distinguished acute-like (mimicking coronavirus-infected patients with prolonged hospitalisation) from recovering-like patients. These signatures also hierarchically represented systems-level parameters associated with PBMC including dysregulated cytokines, genes, pathways, networks of pathways/concepts, immune status, and cell types. Proof-of-principle confirmatory observations included PBMC-associated increases in ACE2, cytokine storm-associated IL6, enhanced innate immunity (macrophages and neutrophils), and lower adaptive T and B cell immunity in patients with acute-like disease compared to those with recovery-like disease. Patients in the recovery-like stage had significantly enhanced TNF, IFN-g, anti-viral, HLA-DQA1, and HLA-F gene expression and cytolytic activity, and reduced pro-viral gene expression compared to those in the acute-like stage in PBMC. Besides, PBMC-derived surrogate-based approach revealed overlapping genes associated with comorbidities (associated diabetes), and disease-like symptoms (associated with thromboembolism, pneumonia, lung disease and septicaemia). Overall, our study involving PBMC-based RNA profiling may further help understand complex and variable systems-wide responses displayed by coronavirus-infected patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207