Land Use and Land Cover Change Analysis Using GIS and Remote Sensing in The Case of Kersa District, Jimma Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Land use and land cover change is driven by human actions and also drives changes that limit availability of products and services for human and livestock, and it can undermine environmental health as well. Therefore, this study was aimed at understanding land use and land cover change in Kersa district over the last 30 years. Time-series satellite images that included Landsat 5 TM, Landsat 7 ETM+, and Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS, which covered the time frame between 1990-2020, were used to determine the change in land use and land cover using object based classification.Results: The object based classification result revealed that in 1990 TM Landsat imagery, natural forest (16.07%), agroforestry (9.21%), village (12.03%), urban (1.93%), and agriculture (60.76%) were identified. The change result showed a rapid reduction in natural forest cover of 25.04%, 9.15%, and 23.11% occurred between (1990-2000), (2000-2010), and (2010-2020) study periods, respectively. Similarly agroforestry decreased by 0.88% and 63.9% (2000-2010) and (2010-2020), respectively. The finding indicates the increment of agricultural land, village, and urban, while the natural forest and agroforestry cover shows a declining trend.Conclusions: The finding implies that there was a rapid land use and land cover change in the study area. This resulted in loss of natural resource and biodiversity. Overall, proper and integrated approach in implementing policies and strategies related to land use and land cover management should be required in kersa district.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".