Evolutionary origin of sex differentiation system in insects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The evolution of the functionality of genes and genetic systems is a major source of animal diversity. Its best example is insect sex differentiation systems: promoting male and female differentiation (dual-functionality) or only male differentiation (single-functionality). However, the evolutionary origin of such functional diversity is largely unknown. Here, we investigate the ancestral functions of doublesex , a key factor of insect sex differentiation system, using the apterygote insect, Thermobia domestica , and reveal that its doublesex is essential for only males at the phenotypic level, but contributes to promoting female-specific vitellogenin expression in females. This functional discordance between the phenotypic and transcription-regulatory levels in T. domestica shows a new type of functionality of animal sex differentiation systems. Then, we examine how the sex differentiation system transited from the single-functionality to the dual-functionality in phenotypes and uncover that a conserved female-specific motif of doublesex is detected in taxa with the dual-functional doublesex . It is estimated that the role of the sex differentiation system for female phenotypes may have evolved through accumulating mutations in the protein motif structures that led to the enhancement of its transcription-regulatory function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".