MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3187378549 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2020-0575

String cosmology from fractional action with solitonic NS–NS matter and possibility of an accelerated expanding universe without dark energy

2021· article· en· W3187378549 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rami Ahmad El‐Nabulsi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDark energyCosmologyDe Sitter universeString cosmologyDilatonUniverseZero-energy universeString (physics)Theoretical physicsMetric expansion of spaceDissipative systemVacuum energyPhantom energyMathematical physicsAstrophysicsQuantum mechanicsRelationship between string theory and quantum field theoryQuantum gravityQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we discuss string cosmology with solitonic NS–NS matter, which arises when dilaton coupled p-brane gas dominates the universe and is subject to a fractional action motivated from viscosity dissipative effects occurring in the universe. Exact solutions are found from the stationary conditions of the fractional action. It was observed that the universe is non-singular, undergoing accelerated expansion in time and may not be dominated by dark energy because it is strongly affected by dissipations through the fractional parameter α. The numerical ranges of α were obtained using H(z) at the 1σ level for two independent cases: a vacuum energy dominated energy and a non-dominant vacuum energy universe. Our results are in agreement with astronomical observational limits and support both string cosmology and the fractional action cosmology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→