MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187415135 · doi:10.1002/pmrj.12686

Cardiovascular sequelae of <scp>sports‐related</scp> concussions

2021· review· en· W3187415135 on OpenAlexaff
Halli Krzyzaniak, Ali Fatehi Hassanabad

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyClinical trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are becoming more aware of sports-related concussions (SRCs). Current return-to-play (RTP) guidelines are often based on subjective clinical symptoms rather than objective physiologic measures. Although evidence is limited, the purpose of this article is to summarize the data pertaining to acute and chronic cardiovascular effects of SRCs, and to determine whether there are objective metrics that could improve currently used RTP protocols. Research shows that SRCs cause cardiovascular autonomic nervous system (CV-ANS) dysfunction induced by decreased baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS). This disturbance persists past the point of clinical symptom resolution and can worsen through subsequent exertion, which may impact long-term recovery. Further studies are needed to establish the most appropriate physiologic metrics for analyzing recovery post-SRC and whether the addition of physiologic measures to RTP guidelines improves recovery from these injuries. This is an understudied area that carries important clinical implications. Larger and more robust trials are warranted to inform the development of guidelines that should focus on lessening the compounding effects of multiple concussions and improve the management of SRCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207