MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187422175 · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2021.05.159

Association of variants of genes involved in mitochondrial metabolism with pancreatic cancer risk

2021· article· en· W3187422175 on OpenAlexaff
Giulia Peduzzi, Manuel Gentiluomo, Francesca Tavano, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, S. Ermini, Ugo Boggi, Giulia Martina Cavestro, G. Capurso, Luca Morelli, Anna Caterina Milanetto, Raffaele Pezzilli, Rita T. Lawlor, Silvia Carrara, Martin Loveček, P. Souček, Vodičková, Feng Guo, T. Hackert, F.G. Uzunoğlu, M. Gazouli, A. Párniczky, J. Kupcinskas, M.F. Bijlsm, B. Bueno-de-Mesquita, Roel Vermeulen, Casper H.J. van Eijck, Krzysztof Jamroziak, Renata Talar‐Wojnarowska, W. Greenhalf, D. Gioffreda, Micaela Petrone, Stefano Landi, L. Archibugi, M. Puzzono, Niccola Funel, Cosimo Sperti, M.L. Piredda, Beatrice Mohelníková-Duchoňová, V. Hlaváč, Xin Gao, Martina Schneider, J.R. Izbicki, G. Theodoropoulos, S. Bunduc, Edita Kreivėnaitė, O.R. Busch, Ewa Małecka‐Panas, Eithne Costello, F. Perri, Sara Testoni, G. Vanella, Claudio Pasquali, Martin Oliverius, H. Brenner, Martin Loos, M Götz, Κωνσταντίνος Γεωργίου, B. Erőss, E. Maiello, Ádám Szentes, F. Bazzocchi, Daniela Basso, John P. Neoptolemos, P. Hegyi, V. Kiudelis, F. Canzian, Daniele Campa

Bibliographic record

VenuePancreatology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostsynaptic potentialSynaptic plasticitySynaptic vesicleExcitatory postsynaptic potentialHippocampal formationDocosahexaenoic acidHippocampusNeuroscienceSynaptic cleftArachidonic acidBiologyChemistryCell biologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBiochemistryVesicleFatty acidNeurotransmitterPolyunsaturated fatty acidInhibitory postsynaptic potentialCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePancreatologySame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207