In Situ‐Prepared Attachable Transparent Luminescent Solar Concentrators for Photovoltaic with Polymer Antireflection/Barrier Layer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As large‐area photon collection devices designed to convert sunlight into electricity, luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) have been proposed for more than 40 years. In practical sunlight‐harvesting applications, existing glass windows or curtain walls have to be torn down and then replaced by traditional LSCs with planar optical waveguides, leading to high manufacture and installation costs. One alternative and attractive approach is to design and manufacture LSCs that are compatible with and can be attached directly onto the original building glass windows, which substantially reduces the overall costs. Herein, a feasible strategy of attachable transparent LSCs is proposed, converting ordinary glass to LSCs by simply attaching novel luminescent films. By integrating a phenylethylammonium (PEA)‐assisted perovskite−PVDF composite film with a polymer antireflection/barrier layer, as‐prepared composite films show dramatical improvement in photoluminescence quantum yield from 4.1% to 45.8% (11‐fold enhancement), substantially increased optical transmittance from 30.9% to 71.1% (at 700 nm), as well as strongly suppressed photoluminescence (PL) quenching during the attaching process. The fabricated attachable LSCs demonstrate a maximum optical efficiency of 2.8% at the geometric factor of 5 and retain 87% of initial optical efficiency after 2 months of storage in ambient conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it