MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187431020 · doi:10.1061/9780784483619.026

New Bonnybrook Wastewater Treatment Plant Treated Effluent Outfall—Design, Contracting, and Construction Overview

2021· article· en· W3187431020 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Morales, Darren Finney

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutfallEffluentDiffuser (optics)Flood mythEnvironmental scienceWastewaterEnvironmental engineeringSewage treatmentHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringWater resource managementGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bonnybrook Wastewater Treatment Plant (BBWWTP) is one of the largest cold weather BNR plants in the world undergoing a significant expansion, including a new outfall to discharge all treated effluent into the Bow River. The BBWWTP currently discharges all the treated effluent flow into the Bow River via a conventional bank outfall. The new outfall is not only required for plant expansion but also is an integral part of a flood protection plan for the site. Design of the outfall system was focused to strike a balance between flood protection capabilities, upsize for expected flow increase to year 2076, environmental enhancement, and cost. The outfall is designed to convey 1,962 MLD (22.71 m3/s) (518 MGD) to a new exfiltration style diffuser under the bed of the Bow River. Construction of the new outfall is ongoing and scheduled to be complete by the end of 2021. The presentation will discuss the project drivers and motivations, some of the key design and construction challenges, and contracting strategy used to deliver this infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2021Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207